| join now | shop | freebies & contests | help
     gURL.com  the Web    web search powered by Yahoo!


SHOUT OUT BOARDS

YOUR ROOM


HELP ME HEATHER

SEX ED BLOG



gURL GAMES

QUIZZES



COMIX

PHOTOS



POLLS

VIDEO



BODY IMAGE

SEX

  you are here  >>> REACT > dig or dis > movies  
  related topics  >>>  music, movies & media    

 
   you are here: MOVIES
   
sequels

what do you think?
dig it or dis it
31
Digs


as long as the first movie was good than they could do what they want....just dont make a third one,thats only good for movies like Star Wars
--Posted by ksaw130




as long as the first movie was good than they could do what they want....just dont make a third one,thats only good for movies like Star Wars
--Posted by ksaw130



I guess so?
Well, i think it really depends on the movie. Some movies don't need a sequel, and some are awesome.
--Posted by xxpaper_cutxx




sum are betta than tha first
--Posted by neicy2504




U DO NOT HAVE TO READ THEM
ok tell me y u r dissing thezz sequels sometimez u really need an ending or u will like die !
--Posted by blondie13girl





YEAH!!
I like sequels. They give you something to look forward to. My fave is Harry Potter 4. really violent but VERY good action an acting. Kept me on the edge of my seat THE WHOLE TIME.
--Posted by kacbacya1015



I love sequels!
I love sequels a lot because they show you what happened after the first movie ended. There is no end in real life to anything...so why should there be an end to a movie's plot? Remind me again?
--Posted by her_delilahness



Yeah!
I wanna see what happens next! :D
--Posted by cece116



ok...
they're ok as long as they have the samne actors and actresses in them...
--Posted by lexix3



ok...
they're ok as long as they have the samne actors and actresses in them...
--Posted by lexix3




It depends...
I don't have a problem with the idea of sequels. Sometimes you need to continue a story. In the case of the original three Star Wars movies, I thought Empire Strikes Back was better than the first one. And I thought Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban was waaaay better than the first two movies. The only thing I don't like about sequels is that a lot of them tend to suck. And sometimes they ruin the original movie for you, like in the case of Legally Blonde. (I still like that movie, but not as much due to the shitty sequel.)
--Posted by lucyinthesky490




A lot of them are crap, but some are really good! Besides, it gives the diehard fans some more fodder, even if it's not as good as the first.
--Posted by iluvthecheat



the sandlot
sequels are good....sometimes. a sequel that made me mad was the sadlot. that movie is amazing, and they messed it up with a sequel. the sequel sucked and i wish i never watched it
--Posted by carvemestars



can you be both?
sequels usually suck, ie Dirty Dancing Havana Nights, Miss Congeniality 2, and the godfather of all bad sequels George of the Jungle 2. but then there are like the Lord of the Ring movies, (whch ive never seen but ive heard their good) and of course pirates 2 which im not sure if its good yet, i need to see pirates 3 to find out so it depends on the sequel.
--Posted by ellieann



it can be a dig or dis
Some sequels are good like Spiderman 2 and Pirates of the Carribean: Dead Man's Chest, but sometimes they suck.
--Posted by darkkat_72_gurl



25
Disses

Define "sequel"
I like movies [and books] that were intended to have multiple parts-- Lord of the Rings [and His Dark Materials for books] for example. The whole thing is very together and pleasing to watch or read, although usually one could stand alone though not as strongly as with the others in the group. But when one movie is a success, and somebody goes, "Hey! Let's make a cheap sequel that we never even planned!" and they churn out cheap sequel/prequels (thing Star Wars Episode 1-3 or all the poorly animated Disney Princess movies) then I just have to diss it. And unfortunately, the latter is far more common than the planned former. However, I am hoping that Pirates of the Carribean: Dead Man's Chest and the one to come after are equally good; I've heard that three /was/ the unvoiced plan, and the next two are coming out together, not just after the first one is a success...
--Posted by tata_the_nifty




absolute crap!
cmon ppl! everyone knows basically every single sequel is no where near as good as the original!!!! the plot is no where near as good, just because the 1st movie made a bomb, doesnt mean their crappy sequels will make anything near as much! to be fair some sequels are good but most are rubbish
--Posted by candlefire85




not that good
some really,really,really...su ck. think about it you kind of want it to have the same meaning as the first one. and then they screw it up
--Posted by babybuttoneyes



Sucks 95% + 5% Of WHAT THE HELL?
The sequels are just a waist of my time and money. The only reason the company makes sequels is to make more money off the movie by not having to write what has already happen into the script. It destroys the movie and comfuses me.
--Posted by noname



noo
I personally am not the biggest fan of sequels.Shrek 2 was one of the good movies to come out with sequels but movies like LiON king should've just been left with the first one,they just keep getting worse
--Posted by dustinsdream





sequels are never as good as the first
--Posted by baybgurlniss15



Hmm...
Well, most of them suck. Think about all the disney movies they are making now! Jus t for money. Lion King 1 1/2? Please! If a movie is palnned to be a sequel (like the Matrix, XMen, LOTR and POTC) then I'm OK, with it. Other then that... :(
--Posted by eirra




sometimes theyre good sometimes they aint it really depends on peoples tastes b/c i could love one movie & someone else could hate it thats life sexy love it
--Posted by wonderwoman123



most
of them suck but there have been a few ok ones
--Posted by ifailtocare




:/
--Posted by brennathezombie




It Depends
If it's a movie that is meant to be a sequal then I guess, but the 1st one is usually always the best of them all.
--Posted by flyingmaniac




depends.
i heard someone say before that all sequels SUCK. but i have seen some pretty good sequels. but there.s just some movies that i HATED as a sequel. for instance MIB 2. that dissapointed me a lot. lol
--Posted by j0liex14




Can you Imagine Pulp Fiction 2?
I think sequels are just an excuse to make more $$$ off an idea that struck gold. That's why most decent movies don't have sequels...they are honest are just about entertainment.
--Posted by lovelyloner




sequels suck
they get worse every movie.
--Posted by punker3130




NO!!!
THEY KINDA RUIN THE FIRST MOVIE THAT WAS OUT! YEAH!
--Posted by steffy930



You must be a gURL member to post. Not a gURL member? Join now! (It's free!)





email this feature to a friend:
IM this feature to a friend (AIM only):
tell us what you think of this feature.

  CONNECT EXPLORE gURL.com BY TOPIC ABOUT gURL  
 
shout out boards
gURL newsletter


being yourself
beliefs
body image
brainylicious
dating
d.i.y.
fashion & style
friends & family
health
music, movies & media
school & careers
sex
sports
sucky emotions

contact us
what is gURL?
advertise on gURL
privacy policy
terms of service
help

 
  ADVERTISEMENT

   
   Also... Get your horoscope mailed to you every day!
   Sign up for gURL and Astrology.com's daily newsletter.

 

© iVillage Inc. 1995-2008. All rights reserved.