do you think these jean ads are too racy for teen magazines?
a print ad for Buffalo Jeans, David Bitton, copyright 2002.
This ad appeared in an issue of Cosmogirl magazine. While sex sells, as they say, do you think this ad is appropriate for a teen magazine? Is the model's pose too suggestive of soft porn? Or do you think it's no big deal?
643 member responses
This is Sexy?
It looks like a low budget beginning of a porno tube video. I'm sure if she had her pants on and advertised the jeans she would look less stupid.
Stupid isn't sexy. Maybe to a guy but only because if you're stupid, being easy isn't too far from the tree. --Posted by kittie17 10:11PM EST 10/14/08
about the thong . . .
I think she'd be sexier if it wasn't showing, if sexy is what she's aiming for. --Posted by rosie_toes 08:17PM EST 10/11/08
I'm wondering how effective any of these sexy ads are. None of them tell you anything about the product, and few even mention what the product is. Why are they advertising the removal of their product?
...Oh well. Her jeans are ugly anyway. --Posted by stolenelectron 04:34PM EST 09/02/08
You must be a gURL member to post. Not a gURL member? Join now! (It's free!)
