| join now | shop | freebies & contests | help
     gURL.com  the Web    web search powered by Yahoo!


SHOUT OUT BOARDS

YOUR ROOM


HELP ME HEATHER

SEX ED BLOG



gURL GAMES

QUIZZES



COMIX

PHOTOS



POLLS

VIDEO



BODY IMAGE

SEX

  you are here  >>> REACT > clips about clips > misc. media  
  related topics  >>>  body image  |  music, movies & media    

 

do cut-and-paste magazine covers go too far?

the cover of Redbook magazine's July 2003 issue

Most people know that magazines airbrush and touch up photos of celebrities and models. But it's becoming more common to cut and paste different photos of a celebrity onto each other to get a picture that "pops" on newsstands. Redbook's photoshopped Jennifer Aniston and Julia Roberts' cover photos drew fire from the actresses for both looking badly out of proportion and for not being real. Is this a fair practice? Or does this kind of image manipulation cross the line? What do you think?


157 member responses

    
    ........
    i don't really understand what the 'cut-and-paste' part means...sorry. :( but I DO know that photoshopping pics of models and celebrities to make them look better is horrible.
    --Posted by broadway_chick94
    11:52PM EST 01/03/08


    
    Well
    Obviously if the stars them selves are pissed off they crossed the line.
    --Posted by lily_ann_sabrina
    05:53PM EST 07/06/07


    
    omg
    i hate this... why can't anyone be happy with the way they look doesn't anyone stop to think about how it makes them look... all it says to me is that she has low self esteam!!!!!!!
    --Posted by death_by_mascara
    01:40AM EST 07/02/07


    
    Double UNH--UH!
    Isn't that kind of like "stealing" the pictures? If they don't have permission from the stars? And editing without permish, too. Shameful. But they [the magazine companies] will do anything to sell.
    --Posted by lollypopxangel
    08:45PM EST 05/23/07


    
    He...
    Kind of ironic taht it says "The Real Julia" on the cover.... Anyway, the only problem that I see with it is that it isn't good for teh star. They don't wanna be some frankenstein on the cover of a magazine.
    --Posted by spiffyelgato
    12:53PM EST 02/27/07



    
    nope, no it's not
    It's insulting to have your image used and then have it completely warped. It's like being recognised for your idea and then someone making little alterations to the point of your idea being unrecognisable to you. It's just not fair. Not to mentnion it makes the magazine uncredible because you can tell that she wasn't posing for them and that it was probably a cut and paste. How ironic though that the headline says "the real julia".
    --Posted by sicilica
    11:06AM EST 01/25/07


    
    UNH-UH!
    It's okay to give someone some make-up or a push-up to make them look a little better but cutting and pasting makes girls think they need to cut and paste themselves into something they only think they want to be. Stardome isn't that great and it has bad effects... and I think this cover does too.
    --Posted by bandvolleychic27
    02:40PM EST 10/31/06

You must be a gURL member to post. Not a gURL member? Join now! (It's free!)



email this feature to a friend:
IM this feature to a friend (AIM only):
tell us what you think of this feature.

  CONNECT EXPLORE gURL.com BY TOPIC ABOUT gURL  
 
shout out boards
gURL newsletter


being yourself
beliefs
body image
brainylicious
dating
d.i.y.
fashion & style
friends & family
health
music, movies & media
school & careers
sex
sports
sucky emotions

contact us
what is gURL?
advertise on gURL
privacy policy
terms of service
help

 
  ADVERTISEMENT

   
   Also... Get your horoscope mailed to you every day!
   Sign up for gURL and Astrology.com's daily newsletter.

 

© iVillage Inc. 1995-2008. All rights reserved.