Could Your Teacher Get Fined If You Have Safe Sex With Your BF?

gateway sexual behavior

His hands better stay in his pockets, or their teachers may get fined. | Source: Shutterstock

I don’t know what your sex ed class was like. Mine was a week long course where our gym teacher Mr. Danber (who for some reason still dressed in sweats even though we weren’t playing sports) wrote stuff like, “If you don’t have safe sex, you’re stupid” on the board, explained ovulation, and went through birth control options.

And sure, it was embarrassing to get lectured by a man wearing an Adidas visor about what my vagina was up to, but I learned a lot about my body and how to keep myself safe during sex. And that info has served me well. (No unwanted babies or STDs here!) Well, guess what? If Mr. Danber came out of retirement, strapped on his visor, and taught that same week long course to students in Tennessee, he could get a hefty fine. WTF?

A new law was enacted in Tennessee that bans teachers from promoting “gateway sexual activities” in sex ed classes in an effort to expand their abstinence-only policy. But uh, what exactly are those? The Tennessee government defines it as the touching of “gateway body parts,” which they list as “genitals, buttocks, breasts and the inner thigh.” However, teachers and speakers in sex ed classes are allowed to discuss hand holding and kissing, because, you know, those are the important and confusing parts of sex that you need explained to you! Yeah right!

So, talking about anything beyond first base with a partner is off limits but what about solo sex? The law isn’t clear on where it stands in terms of masturbation, either–which is the safest (and let’s be real, sometimes best) sex there is.

One of the law’s supporters says the move is necessary because one teacher encouraged girls to offer guys oral sex in order to get them to wear condoms. Ok, so that’s kind of effed. Condoms are important, but you should never have to bargain with your partner to put one on. And you especially shouldn’t be offering oral sex as a trade off for safe sex. But to ban the entire state’s education system from talking about sex because one teacher said the wrong thing? That doesn’t make sense, like, at all.

gateway sexual behavior

Apparently anything beyond hand holding or kissing will lead to this. Dude, seriously? | Source: Shutterstock

The fact is, abstinence is the safest form of birth control–it’s the only 100 percent foolproof way to prevent STDs and pregnancy. But let’s be real–it’s also not realistic to think that just because teachers tell you not to have sex that you’re not going to do it. Roughly 30 percent of you are already having sex. Those are the facts, Tennessee, and this law isn’t going to change that!

It’s super important to teach about safe sex, even if the government doesn’t necessarily want you to have any sex whatsoever. Since a lot of you are going to do it anyway, it’s narrow minded and dangerous to not teach you guys how to do it safely, responsibly, and with minimal risk. In fact, teaching about safe sex often lessens the rate of teen pregnancy, which is at its lowest since 1940. And really? Your sexual limits should be defined by you and your partners–not by the government.

Do you believe in abstinence-only education? What’s sex ed like in your school? Do you think the “gateway sexual activities” law is smart or stupid? Tell us in the comments!

Posted in: News & Reviews
Tags: , , ,
  • Kaley

    I had a week long sex-ed class in sixth grade and i think they were very good about teaching us about it. My teacher did say something like ” Girls you should wait to have sex. You are only 12 years old. You should be worrying about homework and grade not worrying about weather you’re pregnant or not!” I like that she told to wait not to completely never have sex until marriage.

  • Angie

    In middle school, it was basically just “here, this is how it works, don’t get STD’s, whatever.” There wasn’t really any bias. However, in my high school district, we practice an “abstinence-only” policy. It’s clearly not working, since the majority of the towns in the township are considered “ghetto” and we have tons of pregnant girls walking the hallways. Abstinence-only education only hurts the children it DOESN’T educate, as well as the ones it produces.

  • Elizabeth

    In my school district, it’s against the rules to teach us sex ed, which would explain why we have one of the highest pregnancy rates in all of Texas. But in middle school, I went to a private school, where the extent of that sex ed was “Have sex before you’re married and you will get an STD, and then you WILL die alone because nobody will want to marry a ho-bag with an STD.” Because putting a ring on my finger will eliminate all chances of getting an STD right? (That was sarcasm.)

  • Katherine

    Wow. I’m glad I don’t live in Tennessee.

  • Nathalie

    While I honestly think parents should be the one teaching their kids this stuff (yes, it’s akward, but then there wouldn’t be stupid laws like this.), abstinence only programs are just stupid. I don’t know anyone who restrained themselves from sex because their public school told them too. Unless you have (VERY) strong convictions behind it, you aren’t going to wait. Not educating kids is asking for spikes in STDs and pregnancy. You’d be surprised how many guys don’t know how to put a condom on right…

  • BleedingSun

    Its stupid. All kinds of ignorant and stupid.

  • maya

    I live in Tennessee but this is the first I here of this law. I think its stupid they have right to limit my knowledge of things that are importance.